Effects of Robot-assisted Upper Extremity Rehabilitation on Change in Functioning and Disability in Patients With Neurologic Impairment: A Pilot Study

Valentina Blažinčić*; Ivica Ščurić; Ivana Klepo; Ivan Dubroja; Duško Cerovec

doi:10.26332/seemedj.v5i1.181

Valentina Blažinčić* Special Hospital for Medical Rehabilitation Krapinske Toplice, Department of Neurorehabilitation, Krapinske Toplice; Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Croatia http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4931-7538
Ivica Ščurić Special Hospital for Medical Rehabilitation Krapinske Toplice, Department of Craniocerebral Rehabilitation and Acute Neurology, Krapinske Toplice; School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Croatia
Ivana Klepo Special Hospital for Medical Rehabilitation Krapinske Toplice, Department of Neurorehabilitation, Krapinske Toplice, Croatia
Ivan Dubroja Special Hospital for Medical Rehabilitation Krapinske Toplice, Department of Craniocerebral Rehabilitation and Acute Neurology, Krapinske Toplice, Croatia
Duško Cerovec Special Hospital for Medical Rehabilitation Krapinske Toplice, Department of Cardiology Rehabilitation, Krapinske Toplice; Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Croatia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26332/seemedj.v5i1.181

Abstract

Introduction: The aim is to evaluate the effect of robot-assisted training on the most important aspects of functioning and disability in patients with upper extremity neurologic impairment.

Materials and Methods: A prospective six-week pilot study included robot-assisted training of the upper extremity and conventional neurorehabilitation in 12 participants after a stroke or traumatic brain injury. Outcome measurements were range of motion (ROM), the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set for Hand and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain sensation. A Wilcoxon test was used for the analysis of pre- and post-test differences and Spearman’s correlation was used for connecting the data collected.

Results: A statistically significant difference was found for ROM (shoulder abduction/adduction, shoulder flexion/extension, shoulder internal/external rotation and forearm pronation/supination) and a number of ICF categories (Body Function: b280, b710, b715, b730, b760; Activities and Participation: d230, d430, d440, d445, d5). A significant positive correlation of medium intensity (r=0.589) was found between the duration of movement coordination training and the ICF category b760. We did not find a statistically significant difference in pain sensation (VAS) with regard to the direct use of the device. For all analyses, p<0.05 and CI was 95%.

Conclusion: Robot-assisted training and conventional neurorehabilitation improved motor and functional recovery. There was a correlation between training a specific goal on the device and one of the ICF Body Function categories.